Global Markets Reel Amid US-Iran Tensions: Volatility, Oil Surges, and Recession Fears
Global financial markets experienced significant volatility following escalating tensions and reported military actions between the United States and Iran, coupled with evolving diplomatic rhetoric concerning the Strait of Hormuz. These events triggered sharp declines and subsequent recoveries in equity markets, a surge and later moderation in oil prices, and rising bond yields. Economic concerns centered on potential inflation, stagflation, and recessionary risks, compounded by disruptions to global energy and supply chains.
Market Movements and Performance
Global financial markets demonstrated considerable fluctuation. Initially, major stock indexes across Asia and the US futures market experienced sharp declines, which were then followed by periods of recovery.
Initial Declines
Major markets worldwide saw immediate drops as tensions flared:
- Australia's ASX 200 index initially slumped by 2.7 percent at opening, falling over 4.4 percent to 8,457 points at its lowest, wiping an estimated $135 billion from stock value. It later recovered to close 2.85 percent lower at 8,599 points. A single day saw losses reported at $110 billion. The index later fell to 8,366 points, a 0.7 percent decrease, after an earlier drop of approximately 2 percent.
- US futures indicated a decline of approximately 2.5 percent for the Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500 when trading commenced.
- Japan's Nikkei 225 tumbled by 5.2 percent, later reported as plunging 6.2 percent and approximately 7 percent.
- South Korea’s KOSPI fell 6 percent, later reported as dropping 6.7 percent and approximately 8 percent, triggering temporary circuit breakers.
- Hong Kong’s Hang Seng index fell 3.2 percent at the open, later reported as decreasing by about 3.5 percent.
- France’s CAC 40 dropped 1 percent.
- The Shanghai Composite decreased by close to 2.5 percent.
Recoveries and Later Performance
Despite initial plunges, some markets showed resilience and began to recover:
- The S&P 500 initially dropped by 1.5 percent before recovering to a 0.8 percent gain.
- The Dow Jones Industrial Average reversed an almost 900-point decline to rise 239 points (0.5 percent).
- The Nasdaq composite climbed 1.4 percent, though it later dropped over 10 percent since the conflict's start, entering "correction" territory.
- The Australian sharemarket was projected to recover previous losses, with futures indicating a 2.2 percent rise. The S&P/ASX 200 later closed up by 0.1 percent to 8,379.
- The MSCI All Country World Index, representing global stocks, fell 9 percent since the conflict began.
- The Australian market declined by about 7.4 percent since the conflict's start.
- The US share market experienced a 3.6 percent decline over two days, bringing its total decrease to approximately 7.7 percent since the conflict began.
Oil Price Fluctuations
Crude oil prices exhibited significant volatility, initially surging before experiencing declines linked to diplomatic developments.
Price Surge
- Brent crude oil, the international standard, briefly touched $US119.50 per barrel, its highest since 2022, after an initial surge over 20 percent to $US111 a barrel.
- Benchmark US crude (West Texas Intermediate - WTI) reached $US119.48. WTI prices reached over $US110 a barrel, having been $US61 two weeks prior. Overall, oil prices rose from approximately $US70 to $US115 per barrel.
Price Decline and Stabilization
- Brent crude later settled at $US98.96 and further dropped below $US90, before rising 4 percent to nearly $US104 a barrel.
- WTI crude dropped 10.36 percent, closing at $US88.13 after falling as low as $US84.73. Brent crude later remained largely steady near $US113 a barrel.
Impact on Fuel Prices
The volatility in crude prices directly translated to consumer costs. The average US petrol price increased from $US2.98 to $US3.98 per gallon, and diesel from $US3.76 to $US5.40 per gallon.
Geopolitical Developments and Diplomacy
Escalating rhetoric and actions between the United States and Iran, along with subsequent diplomatic overtures, heavily influenced market sentiment.
Escalation and Rhetoric
- Iran's leadership transition saw Mojtaba Khamenei, described as a hardline cleric, chosen to succeed his father as supreme leader.
- Then-US President Donald Trump reiterated promises to confront Iran, stating in social media posts that "Iran is no longer the 'Bully of the Middle East,' they are, instead, 'THE LOSER OF THE MIDDLE EAST'," and would be "hit very hard." He also stated that "Short term oil prices, which will drop rapidly when the destruction of the Iran nuclear threat is over, is a very small price to pay for U.S.A., and World, Safety and Peace. ONLY FOOLS WOULD THINK DIFFERENTLY!"
- Reports indicated attacks on oil and gas facilities, a continued blockage of the Strait of Hormuz, and Gulf oil and gas producers scaling back output due to filled storage tanks.
- The US deployed approximately 10,000 additional marines and airborne troops to the Middle East. Iran threatened to retaliate by targeting energy and water infrastructure of US regional allies if hostilities escalated.
Diplomatic Developments and Market Reaction
- Markets reversed during the final hour of Wall Street's trading after President Trump informed CBS News that he believed "the war is very complete, pretty much." He further stated that Iran had "nothing left" militarily and was considering "taking over" the Strait of Hormuz. These comments reportedly eased earlier concerns.
- President Trump later announced a five-day delay on potential US strikes against Iran's energy infrastructure, stating recent talks with Iranian leaders were "very good and productive," effectively withdrawing an immediate 48-hour ultimatum. The grace period was later extended to 10 days.
- President Trump announced discussions with a top Iranian official about ending the conflict, mentioning a 15-point plan and potential in-person meetings. Iranian authorities subsequently denied these claims, describing them as "fake news" aimed at lowering oil prices. CBS News later reported that a senior Iranian foreign ministry official had told the broadcaster exclusively that points from the US had been received through mediators and were under review.
- The Strait of Hormuz, a critical waterway for global oil transport, remained largely closed, with Iran reportedly allowing passage only for some oil tankers from countries with which it has friendly relations, charging yuan-denominated tolls.
- Speculation arose regarding substantial market trading occurring five minutes before President Trump's announcement, including $1.5 billion in S&P 500 futures bought and $192 million in oil futures sold. Analysts stated such claims could not be confirmed without an official investigation.
Broader Economic Concerns
The conflict and its market impacts raised significant economic concerns globally.
Inflation and Stagflation
Sustained high oil prices raised concerns about "stagflation," a scenario where economic growth stagnates while inflation remains high.
This was seen as potentially impacting household budgets and company expenses. The market's reaction was linked to a sharp increase in oil prices, which could contribute to inflation and potentially lead to slower economic growth.
Recessionary Risks
Economists indicated that surging oil prices and rising interest rates could place significant pressure on the economy and consumers, increasing the likelihood of a recession. One economist suggested a "better than even money chance that we'll have a recession of some type in the next two or three years."
Supply Chain Disruptions
Beyond oil and gas, significant price movements were observed in diesel, jet fuel, fertilizer, key chemicals like sulphur, and gases such as helium. These commodities are critical for industrial, agricultural, and technological sectors. The increased energy costs and supply disruptions fueled fears of supply chain shocks.
Impact on AI Sector
The conflict posed a threat to the artificial intelligence sector, which requires substantial energy, a robust manufacturing supply chain for hardware, and a profitable economy for its services.
Regional Vulnerability
Asian economies were particularly vulnerable to steep price increases and reduced availability of oil and gas. Europe, facing lower growth and reliant on fuel imports, confronted another energy crisis similar to the one following the Russia-Ukraine conflict, but with reduced fiscal flexibility. The US economy, while showing signs of slowing and a stalling job market before the conflict, benefited from its own oil and gas supplies, mitigating some price impacts.
Interest Rates and Bond Markets
- The yield on the 10-year Treasury decreased to 4.10 percent from 4.15 percent. Early Monday, the yield briefly rose above 4.20 percent due to inflation and oil price concerns but later slid as oil prices eased.
- Australia's 10-Year Treasury bond remained above 5 percent, its highest point since 2011, signaling concerns about rising inflation.
- The US bond market also experienced a sell-off, with yields rising significantly. Expectations for US Federal Reserve Board rate cuts decreased from at least two to one, with a more than 30 percent probability of a rate increase now priced into the markets.
Specific Market and Sector Performance
Currency
The Australian dollar strengthened against the US dollar, trading at US70.77¢, later decreasing by 0.7 percent to 69.6 US cents.
Precious Metals
Silver fell by nearly 2 percent, and gold dropped 2.6 percent to $US4,370 per ounce, representing a 20 percent decline from its recent peak. Gold prices decreased by approximately 15 percent since the commencement of the US-Israeli operation. Gold faced additional downward pressure from hawkish central bank meetings and reports of Gulf Cooperation Council countries selling gold holdings to increase liquidity.
Australian Sectors
Within the Australian market, oil and gas stocks, including Woodside, experienced gains. Conversely, major companies such as BHP, Rio Tinto, and major banks saw their share prices decline significantly. BHP slumped over 6 percent, Commonwealth Bank was down 4 percent, and Wesfarmers fell 2.7 percent. Airlines, including Qantas (dropped 5.7 percent) and Virgin Australia (declined 9 percent), were particularly affected by concerns over travel disruptions and rising oil costs.
Retail Investor Activity
The sharemarket volatility, including reported losses of $110 billion in a single day, led to increased activity among retail investors who perceived falling prices as buying opportunities.
- Investors, including financial planners and influencers, invested in discounted ETFs related to resources, technology, and defense industries.
- Trading platforms reported substantial retail investor engagement, with one platform noting one of its busiest trading days. Activity was dominated by longer-term investors, particularly those under 40, focusing on ETF strategies, including products from Vanguard, Betashares' high-yield product, and ETFs tracking the NASDAQ100 US index.
- Older, more experienced investors also increased activity, focusing on individual company holdings, with mining companies such as Woodside, BHP, and Pilbara Minerals seeing heavy trading, alongside a notable sell-off of bank shares.
- A trading app observed a 41 percent increase in brokerage account openings. Users on this platform reportedly invested in instruments tracking West Texas Intermediate crude oil futures and other oil-linked ETFs, a deviation from the usual trend of moving towards safe-haven assets like gold during Middle East conflicts, attributing this to hedging against rising petrol prices.
Outlook and Expert Analysis
Analysts and economists offered varying perspectives on the trajectory and potential economic consequences of the situation.
- Some strategists suggested oil prices could reach $150 per barrel if the Strait of Hormuz remained closed for several weeks.
- Experts indicated that even with a swift end to hostilities, the disruption to global oil and gas supplies would likely be measured in months due to the time required to repair damaged facilities and restart operations.
- Rabobank's senior global strategist stated that traders were recognizing the "quite terrifying" threat the US and Israeli approach to Iran posed to the global economy, comparing it to a combination of historical oil shocks and supply chain disruptions.
- AMP's chief economist suggested that investor expectations of a swift de-escalation, influenced by past political actions, had limited the full impact on oil prices and share markets but cautioned that the situation could worsen, noting historical oil price shocks typically unfolded over several months.
- Capital Economics noted that global financial markets required evidence that the conflict was "winding down" and questioned whether a unilateral de-escalation by the Trump administration was possible given Iran's continued ability to disrupt traffic in the Strait.
- President Trump's new deadline for Iran to open all access to the Strait of Hormuz was set for Friday, with the "underlying situation remains incredibly fragile."