Australia has implemented a national ban prohibiting individuals under 16 from holding accounts on designated social media platforms. The legislation, which took effect recently, requires social media companies, including Meta, TikTok, and YouTube, to implement "reasonable steps" to ensure compliance.
The Australian government has cited the protection of children from harmful content and algorithms as the primary justification for the ban. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese described the policy as a significant reform, stating his belief in its potential global impact. Australia's legislation is noted for its strictness, as it does not allow for parental approval exemptions, a feature not present in similar proposals or laws in other jurisdictions like the US state of Florida or the European Union. Countries such as Denmark, Malaysia, Singapore, Greece, and Brazil are reportedly observing Australia's implementation as a case study.
The online safety regulator, Julie Inman Grant, indicated that compliance checks would commence shortly. Social media firms found in serious breach of the law face fines of up to A$49.5 million ($33 million, £24.5 million). Neither parents nor children are liable under this legislation.
The policy has garnered significant support among parents in Australia, with polling indicating broad approval. Proponents, such as 12-year-old student Florence Brodribb, suggest the ban could contribute to healthier and safer development for young people by mitigating the influence of social media algorithms. Supporters also hope it will reduce instances of cyberbullying and child exploitation.
Conversely, the ban has faced criticism, particularly from young people and some mental health advocates. Concerns have been raised that the policy may restrict social connection for young people, especially those from LGBTQ+, neurodivergent, or rural communities, and potentially leave them less prepared for navigating online environments. Additionally, experts have voiced apprehension that minors may attempt to bypass age verification systems or seek out less regulated online spaces. Some critics, like Sydney parent Ian, have questioned the efficacy and appropriateness of a blanket prohibition compared to alternative approaches such as enhanced education and content moderation.