The True Meaning of Gaslighting: Beyond a Buzzword
The term "gaslighting" has become widely used, recognized as Merriam-Webster's 2022 Word of the Year. However, its widespread use has led to a watering down and frequent misuse of its meaning, according to some therapists.
"Gaslighting is not merely a disagreement but 'a deliberate effort to undermine my reality, or for me to undermine your reality.'"
This precision comes from Robin Stern, a psychoanalyst and author of The Gaslight Effect.
What Exactly Is Gaslighting?
Experts emphasize that gaslighting is far more insidious than simple disagreement or lying. Sociologist Paige Sweet describes it as "crazy-making" – an attempt to make someone seem or feel mentally unstable. Kate Abramson, author of On Gaslighting, clarifies that it goes beyond mere deceit; it is a broader effort to undermine a person's ability to deliberate. Successful gaslighting ultimately leads victims to mistrust themselves as witnesses to the world.
From Stage to Therapy: The Term's Origin
The term originates from Patrick Hamilton's 1930s play "Gas Light" and its 1944 film adaptation. In the story, a husband systematically manipulates his wife into questioning her sanity. Anthropologist Anthony Wallace first applied the term to the manipulation tactic in a 1961 text. It later became prevalent in therapy settings to describe tactics frequently used by domestic abusers.
The Nuances of Real-World Gaslighting
Paige Sweet notes that real-world gaslighting is often less overt than its fictional depiction, feeding on a victim's unawareness. Gaslighters may use it as a defense mechanism or as a deliberate tool to wield power. Experts also point out that women are often more susceptible to becoming victims, partly due to societal conditioning.
Why Precision Matters: Healing and Awareness
Experts highlight that naming the experience of gaslighting is a crucial step for victims to identify what is happening, reclaim their sense of self, and begin the healing process. However, precision in the term's usage is essential to prevent it from being trivialized. Stern underscores the gravity of the phenomenon, describing it as potentially:
"Soul-destroying for those who experience it."