Study Suggests Dietary Changes May Lower Biological Age in Older Adults
A four-week dietary intervention study from the University of Sydney found that reducing fat or animal-based protein may lower estimated biological age—though researchers caution these are preliminary results.
The findings, published in Aging Cell, analyzed data from 104 participants aged 65–75 who took part in the Nutrition for Healthy Living (NHL) study, a randomized dietary trial.
Study Design and Methods
Participants were assigned to one of four diets for four weeks:
- Omnivorous high-fat (OHF)
- Omnivorous high-carbohydrate (OHC)
- Semi-vegetarian high-fat (VHF)
- Semi-vegetarian high-carbohydrate (VHC)
Biological age was estimated using the Klemera-Doubal Method (KDM), which assesses physiological status based on 20 biomarkers including cholesterol, insulin, and C-reactive protein. Measurements were taken at baseline and after the four-week intervention.
Results
-
The OHF group, which followed a diet most similar to participants' typical Australian diet (high in refined sugar, saturated fat, and processed foods), showed no meaningful change in estimated biological age.
-
Reductions in estimated biological age were observed in the OHC, VHF, and VHC groups compared to the OHF group.
-
Statistically significant reductions were found in the OHC group and for one KDM measure in the VHF group. Reductions in the VHC group were not statistically significant.
-
The OHC diet consisted of 14% energy from protein, 28–29% from fat, and 53% from carbohydrates.
Researcher Interpretations
"Longer term dietary changes are needed to assess whether dietary changes alter the risk of age-related diseases."
— Alistair Senior, Associate Professor
"It's too soon to say definitively that specific changes to diet will extend your life. But this research offers an early indication of the potential benefits of dietary changes later in life."
— Dr. Caitlin Andrews
The authors noted that the observed shifts may reflect acute physiological responsiveness to dietary components rather than true biological age reversal or slowing of aging. The study was not designed to distinguish between short-term adaptation and long-term changes.
Limitations and Context
- The study provides a preliminary indication, not conclusive results.
- Participants at baseline had negative KDM-derived age values, indicating relatively resilient physiological profiles, which may limit generalizability to other populations.
- The authors call for longer-term trials to determine whether improvements translate into reduced disease risk and whether findings apply to other age groups.
- It is unclear whether the impact on biological age is enduring or results in sustained reversal.