A new study led by a researcher at the University of New Mexico examines how misinformation emerges, spreads, and persists in planetary science, particularly regarding asteroid and comet impact risks.
The Threat Beyond the Sky
Published in Meteoritics and Planetary Science, the paper "Preventing and Correcting Spread of Misinformation about Near Earth Objects, Impacts, Airbursts, and Planetary Defense: Case Studies" tackles a growing problem: how bad science goes viral.
Lead author Mark Boslough, a research professor at UNM, and co-authors from 12 institutions identify several key sources of misinformation.
Weak peer-review, overstated press releases, limited scientific literacy, and amplification by AI and social media are all feeding the problem.
The Speed of Falsehood
The study reveals that misinformation can spread on drastically different timescales. In modern news cycles, a false claim can go viral in hours. At the other extreme, persistent myths can survive for centuries.
Boslough offers clear correctives: interstellar comets are not alien spaceships, and claims about Sodom and Gomorrah or ancient advanced civilizations being destroyed by cosmic events lack scientific support.
Why It Matters
The researchers argue that planetary defense relies on public trust and coordinated global response. Misinformation undermines confidence in scientific assessments and emergency plans, creating a vulnerability that is as dangerous as any asteroid.
Strategies for the Future
The paper offers concrete solutions:
- Proactive communication from scientists
- Improved scientific literacy among the public
- Active collaboration between scientists and media professionals
Boslough will discuss the issue at the upcoming Geological Society of America section meeting in Albuquerque.