Back
Politics

Community and Environmental Disputes Highlight Land and Water Management Tensions in Victoria

View source

Development Conflicts in Victoria: Two Projects Spark Controversy

Overview

Two separate developments in Victoria—a private dam construction in Eden Park and a state government-led floodplain restoration project near Swan Hill—have generated distinct conflicts between project proponents and local groups, including residents, traditional owners, and environmental advocates. The disputes center on resource management, regulatory processes, and consultation practices.

Dam Construction in Eden Park

Project Details

  • Businessman Bruce Mathieson is constructing a 50-megalitre dam on privately owned property in the rural locality of Eden Park, west of Whittlesea, Victoria.
  • Over 1 million cubic metres of cleanfill soil have been imported to the site via heavy trucks.
  • The construction company, LandformX, declined to comment. Leaseholder Scott Barrow stated he is not involved in the project.

Regulatory Actions and Communications

  • Melbourne Water issued a works licence for the dam in February 2025 and reported that the licence holder is currently in compliance with the licence conditions.
  • Melbourne Water acknowledged it did not properly advertise the application as required for dams exceeding 20 megalitres.
  • Whittlesea Council stated it has no authority over the project and was given minimal information. The council estimated $1.7 million in road repairs may be required and is considering legal action against the project's builders.
  • The National Heavy Vehicle Regulator conducted patrols but issued no penalties.

The council estimated $1.7 million in road repairs may be required and is considering legal action.

Statements from Involved Parties and Observers

  • Bruce Mathieson: Stated the dam will serve as a community asset by providing water for firefighting and livestock. He referred to opponents as "idiots."
  • Residents: Reported noise, dust, road damage, and dangerous driving by trucks associated with the project.
  • Planning and agricultural experts: Expressed concerns about ecological impacts, including water extraction and soil pathogens.

Context

The dispute forms part of a broader pattern of conflicts over the use of green wedge land for large-scale fill dumping.

Murray River Floodplain Restoration Project

Project Details

  • The Victorian government plans to install regulators, containment banks, and pipes at Nyah-Vinifera Park, a protected river red gum forest on the Murray River floodplain near Swan Hill.
  • The project is part of the Murray-Darling Basin Plan's Sustainable Diversion Limit Adjustment Mechanism, which permits states to reduce environmental water allocations by implementing projects intended to deliver equivalent ecological outcomes.
  • In 2023, Victoria used this mechanism to reduce required environmental water flows by 72 billion litres.
  • The works at Vinifera are expected to affect up to 80 large trees and 15 hectares of smaller trees. Two similar projects are planned at Nyah and Hattah Lakes North, with a combined cost of $100.5 million.

The works at Vinifera are expected to affect up to 80 large trees and 15 hectares of smaller trees.

Background

The Murray-Darling Basin Plan establishes sustainable diversion limits on water removed for agriculture and other uses. In 2017, ministers agreed to allow a 19% reduction (605 billion litres per year on average) in water reserved for the environment through infrastructure projects.

Statements from Involved Parties

  • Victorian environment department spokesperson: The project will return water to the floodplain, supporting healthy ecosystems and protecting native species. The spokesperson stated that water is not reaching parts of the floodplain as frequently as necessary.
  • Wadi Wadi traditional owner Uncle Vince Kirby: Stated that authorities did not consult traditional owners and showed "absolute disrespect" for Aboriginal culture. He claimed the park has been mismanaged and deliberately starved of water taken upstream by licence holders.
  • Dr. Jacquie Kelly (protester): Stated the structures will block animal movement, people, and water flow, creating a division between areas that receive water and those that do not.
  • Environment Victoria chief executive Jono La Nauze: Stated that increasing water flows to the Murray without the adjustment mechanism is achievable, but that Victorian governments have opposed this due to prioritizing agricultural water use.