MLB's Best & Worst Reputations: A Player's Perspective

The Athletic conducted an anonymous poll of over 100 players from 23 teams, asking which MLB organizations have good or bad reputations among uniformed personnel. Here is what they found.

Organizations with Poor Reputations

Colorado Rockies

Received the most mentions (28). Players cited a lack of analytical resources and inadequate player development support.

Pittsburgh Pirates

Criticized for an unwillingness to spend on equipment, treatment, and player amenities.

Oakland Athletics

Poor facilities at the minor-league ballpark and a lack of investment in family amenities.

Chicago White Sox

Lack of resources (e.g., video room equipment) and a failure to support players and families.

Los Angeles Angels

Lack of direction and development, especially for pitchers.

Other teams mentioned: Miami Marlins (low spending, fan disinterest) and Tampa Bay Rays (declining analytics investment, low spending).

"The Rockies received the most mentions (28) for lacking analytical resources and player development support."

Organizations with Good Reputations

Los Angeles Dodgers

Mentioned by nearly two-thirds of respondents. Praised for spending, player development, and strong relationships.

New York Yankees

Appreciated for owner support, rehab treatment, and a winning culture.

Chicago Cubs

Renowned for treatment of families, resources, and a player-first approach.

Toronto Blue Jays

High-quality facilities, travel accommodations, and team culture.

Atlanta Braves

Praised for family treatment, culture, and professionalism.

Small-market standout: The Milwaukee Brewers also received positive mentions for player and family care.

"The Dodgers were mentioned by nearly two-thirds of respondents, praised for spending, player development, and relationships."

Methodology

The poll was conducted among over 100 players from 23 teams. Players were granted anonymity and allowed to give multiple responses.